Skip to content

Without the hype

Nuclear vs Renewables: Output per GW

Energy
An interactive dashboard comparing what each GW of the UK’s nuclear fleet, offshore wind, onshore wind and solar actually generates, how much it varies, and what Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C would add at their higher capacity factors.
Published

6 November 2026

The UK’s five nuclear stations, GW in all, against its wind farms, solar panels, hydro and biomass: how much electricity each GW of capacity has actually produced each year since , how steady that output is, and what Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C would add if they reach the higher capacity factors their EPR reactors are designed for. Annual figures are DESNZ’s; the half-hourly and daily variability comes from NESO’s generation data to . Change the years and assumptions below and everything follows.

Years to average

New nuclear

Today’s fleet

Generation per GW installed

What it takes to match Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C

How sensitive is that to the capacity factors?

Nuclear output, past and projected

How steady is the output?

The annual figures hide most of the difference. A GW of nuclear runs at much the same output day after day, broken by refuelling and outages; a GW of wind swings from almost nothing to most of its capacity within days, and solar follows the sun and the seasons. The charts cover the GB fleet only. Wind is split into offshore and onshore using Elexon’s figures (see Wind in detail), for the years it can be used; other years show wind as one.

Daily output through the year

Duration curve

Seasons and time of day

Wind in detail: onshore and offshore

Year and season

Compare

Low output

Duration curves

How often is the wind below %?

Low-wind spells and swings,

By season

Every year

Notes on the data

  • Renewables (capacity, generation and load factors) are from DESNZ’s Energy Trends table 6.1, UK-wide. Offshore wind includes the small floating fleet; hydro is small and large scale combined; plant biomass includes Drax’s converted units.
  • Nuclear capacity and load factor are from DUKES tables 5.7 and 5.10. Generation per GW is the load factor × 8,766 hours (an average year).
  • Half-hourly and daily variability uses NESO’s historic generation mix, GB only: metered transmission output plus NESO’s estimates of embedded wind and solar. Each half-hour is divided by the capacity installed at the time (DESNZ’s quarterly figures, and the dates each nuclear reactor closed), scaled so each year’s average matches DESNZ’s published load factor. The latest, part year uses the last full year’s scaling. NESO’s solar estimates start in 2013, and its early years count little of the embedded wind, so the 2009–2010 wind shape is the least reliable.
  • Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C are two 1.63 GW EPR units each. The 90% default is the capacity factor in Hinkley Point C’s CfD analysis on this site and close to the EPR’s design availability; no EPR has yet run for long enough in Europe to show what it will achieve. EDF expects Hinkley Point C’s first unit in 2030; Sizewell C reached its final investment decision in July 2025 with no published start date.
  • Existing fleet dates: EDF plans to run Heysham 1, Hartlepool, Heysham 2 and Torness to March 2030 and Sizewell B to 2055 (EDF); those dates depend on graphite inspections and the regulator.
  • Onshore and offshore wind (the wind-in-detail section): NESO’s wind total, split by the offshore share in Elexon’s actual or estimated wind and solar generation (B1630, AGWS). Single-period glitches, and half-hours where Elexon’s total sits more than 35% from its usual ratio to NESO’s, are dropped and the share carried across the gap. Years where Elexon’s total correlates with NESO’s below 0.95, or with more than 15% of half-hours missing, are left out (2016–2017, 2022–2024).
  • Matching annual energy is not the same as replacing a station: wind and solar would also need storage, interconnectors or backup for the still, dark spells shown above, and nuclear needs flexible plant for its outages. The CfD comparison looks at the cost side.
  • Built by nuclear-vs-renewables/prepare.py and refreshed when the site is rebuilt.
Back to top